<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Guide To The Top Keyword Analysis Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.evolution-websites.co.uk/blog/a-guide-to-the-top-keyphrase-analysis-tools/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.evolution-websites.co.uk/blog/a-guide-to-the-top-keyphrase-analysis-tools?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=rss</link>
	<description>This is the place for the latest discussions and articles on: Web Design, E Commerce, Search Engine Optimisation and Online Marketing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 12:51:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Liptrot</title>
		<link>http://www.evolution-websites.co.uk/blog/a-guide-to-the-top-keyphrase-analysis-tools/comment-page-1#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>John Liptrot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolution-websites.co.uk/blog/?p=239#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Really well put together article..thanks!
Its an age old &#039;SEO&#039; argument that I find myself involved in or listening to regularly with my colleagues. 

You can&#039;t ignore the 12% I totally agree, Wordtracker and Keyword discovery are both great tools but can you completely trust the figures whereas the Google tool is basic but you tend to trust the results...&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;201&#039;,&#039;John Liptrot&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;201&#039;,&#039;John Liptrot&#039;,&#039;Really well put together article..thanks!\r\nIts an age old \&#039;SEO\&#039; argument that I find myself involved in or listening to regularly with my colleagues. \r\n\r\nYou can\&#039;t ignore the 12% I totally agree, Wordtracker and Keyword discovery are both great tools but can you completely trust the figures whereas the Google tool is basic but you tend to trust the results...&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really well put together article..thanks!<br />
Its an age old &#8216;SEO&#8217; argument that I find myself involved in or listening to regularly with my colleagues. </p>
<p>You can&#8217;t ignore the 12% I totally agree, Wordtracker and Keyword discovery are both great tools but can you completely trust the figures whereas the Google tool is basic but you tend to trust the results&#8230;
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a  href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('201','John Liptrot'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a  href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('201','John Liptrot','Really well put together article..thanks!
Its an age old 'SEO' argument that I find myself involved in or listening to regularly with my colleagues. 

You can't ignore the 12% I totally agree, Wordtracker and Keyword discovery are both great tools but can you completely trust the figures whereas the Google tool is basic but you tend to trust the results...'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
<p><small>Total Comment by <i>John Liptrot</i>: 1</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.evolution-websites.co.uk/blog/a-guide-to-the-top-keyphrase-analysis-tools/comment-page-1#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 09:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolution-websites.co.uk/blog/?p=239#comment-124</guid>
		<description>I used to use Wordtracker exclusively before the AdWords tool started showing numbers. I&#039;ve also held an annual subscription to KWD. Using Wordtracker and KWD I found keywords with sky high KEI, tons of volume and no competition. I optimised, secured the rank and got very little traffic.

This caused some concern for me and reinforced my view that &#039;guessing&#039; search volumes based on engines hardly anybody uses was suspect.

When Google started releasing numbers the AdWords tool became a whole lot more useful, KWD even words there marketing to suggest they get real data from Google IMHO.

I agree they all have their merits but I don&#039;t agree the Google tool is &quot;left for dust&quot; but that&#039;s just my opinion ;)

d&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;124&#039;,&#039;Dave Robinson&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;124&#039;,&#039;Dave Robinson&#039;,&#039;I used to use Wordtracker exclusively before the AdWords tool started showing numbers. I\&#039;ve also held an annual subscription to KWD. Using Wordtracker and KWD I found keywords with sky high KEI, tons of volume and no competition. I optimised, secured the rank and got very little traffic.\r\n\r\nThis caused some concern for me and reinforced my view that \&#039;guessing\&#039; search volumes based on engines hardly anybody uses was suspect.\r\n\r\nWhen Google started releasing numbers the AdWords tool became a whole lot more useful, KWD even words there marketing to suggest they get real data from Google IMHO.\r\n\r\nI agree they all have their merits but I don\&#039;t agree the Google tool is \&quot;left for dust\&quot; but that\&#039;s just my opinion ;)\r\n\r\nd&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to use Wordtracker exclusively before the AdWords tool started showing numbers. I&#8217;ve also held an annual subscription to KWD. Using Wordtracker and KWD I found keywords with sky high KEI, tons of volume and no competition. I optimised, secured the rank and got very little traffic.</p>
<p>This caused some concern for me and reinforced my view that &#8216;guessing&#8217; search volumes based on engines hardly anybody uses was suspect.</p>
<p>When Google started releasing numbers the AdWords tool became a whole lot more useful, KWD even words there marketing to suggest they get real data from Google IMHO.</p>
<p>I agree they all have their merits but I don&#8217;t agree the Google tool is &#8220;left for dust&#8221; but that&#8217;s just my opinion <img src='http://www.evolution-websites.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>d
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a  href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('124','Dave Robinson'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a  href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('124','Dave Robinson','I used to use Wordtracker exclusively before the AdWords tool started showing numbers. I've also held an annual subscription to KWD. Using Wordtracker and KWD I found keywords with sky high KEI, tons of volume and no competition. I optimised, secured the rank and got very little traffic.

This caused some concern for me and reinforced my view that 'guessing' search volumes based on engines hardly anybody uses was suspect.

When Google started releasing numbers the AdWords tool became a whole lot more useful, KWD even words there marketing to suggest they get real data from Google IMHO.

I agree they all have their merits but I don't agree the Google tool is &quot;left for dust&quot; but that's just my opinion ;)

d'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
<p><small>Total Comments by <i>Dave Robinson</i>: 2</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Gallager</title>
		<link>http://www.evolution-websites.co.uk/blog/a-guide-to-the-top-keyphrase-analysis-tools/comment-page-1#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Gallager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 09:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolution-websites.co.uk/blog/?p=239#comment-29</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Hitwise Google had a 88.74% share of the search market in the UK in November of this year. I donâ€™t know about you but I would not want to miss out on nearly 12% of the market. Traffic volumes can be widely inaccurate at times using the Google tool just try using the new AdWords keyword tool then use the old external one both can show radically different data.</p>
<p>I would say there is no one best tool for the job. Whatâ€™s wrong with an old fashioned thesaurus?
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a  href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('29','Kevin Gallager'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a  href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('29','Kevin Gallager','According to Hitwise Google had a 88.74% share of the search market in the UK in November of this year. I don&acirc;€™t know about you but I would not want to miss out on nearly 12% of the market. Traffic volumes can be widely inaccurate at times using the Google tool just try using the new AdWords keyword tool then use the old external one both can show radically different data.

I would say there is no one best tool for the job. What&acirc;€™s wrong with an old fashioned thesaurus?'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
<p><small>Total Comments by <i>Kevin Gallager</i>: 24</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.evolution-websites.co.uk/blog/a-guide-to-the-top-keyphrase-analysis-tools/comment-page-1#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 16:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.evolution-websites.co.uk/blog/?p=239#comment-24</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I agree with this - &quot;Whilst Google is probably the most widely used search engine, to discount all other engines searches is seriously detrimental to this as a genuine contender for best keyword tool.&quot;

At least with the Google tool you are seeing real numbers (one assumes), the others guess the Google search numbers based on extrapolated data from search engines nobody I know uses.

Just a thought :)

d&lt;div class=&quot;comment-remix-meta&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;replyto&quot; onclick=&quot;replyto(&#039;24&#039;,&#039;Dave Robinson&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Reply&lt;/a&gt;  - &lt;a href=&quot;#&quot; class=&quot;quote&quot; onclick=&quot;quote(&#039;24&#039;,&#039;Dave Robinson&#039;,&#039;I\&#039;m not sure I agree with this - \&quot;Whilst Google is probably the most widely used search engine, to discount all other engines searches is seriously detrimental to this as a genuine contender for best keyword tool.\&quot;\r\n\r\nAt least with the Google tool you are seeing real numbers (one assumes), the others guess the Google search numbers based on extrapolated data from search engines nobody I know uses.\r\n\r\nJust a thought :)\r\n\r\nd&#039;); return false;&quot;&gt;Quote&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I agree with this &#8211; &#8220;Whilst Google is probably the most widely used search engine, to discount all other engines searches is seriously detrimental to this as a genuine contender for best keyword tool.&#8221;</p>
<p>At least with the Google tool you are seeing real numbers (one assumes), the others guess the Google search numbers based on extrapolated data from search engines nobody I know uses.</p>
<p>Just a thought <img src='http://www.evolution-websites.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>d
<div class="comment-remix-meta"><a  href="#" class="replyto" onclick="replyto('24','Dave Robinson'); return false;">Reply</a>  &#8211; <a  href="#" class="quote" onclick="quote('24','Dave Robinson','I'm not sure I agree with this - &quot;Whilst Google is probably the most widely used search engine, to discount all other engines searches is seriously detrimental to this as a genuine contender for best keyword tool.&quot;

At least with the Google tool you are seeing real numbers (one assumes), the others guess the Google search numbers based on extrapolated data from search engines nobody I know uses.

Just a thought :)

d'); return false;">Quote</a></div>
<p><small>Total Comments by <i>Dave Robinson</i>: 2</small></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

